Social singularity

.........................................................

Following the progression of historical epochs, the intelligence of people has increased approximately linearly. However, when time reached the industrial revolution the world met a tipping point: collective intelligence began to increase exponentially.

This is truly interesting. A child thirty years ago would be considered retarded today; increased life quality leads to a higher IQ, which is embodied in the brain (the Flynn effect). But what does it really mean, an increased collective intelligence? What are potential consequences?

The industrial revolution essentially brought the possibility for alternative occupations to the common man, a shift from purely life-sustaining labour to self actualization. Universities were founded, wealth created and life expectancy increased. Concepts such as “choice” and “spare time” were invented. The upper half of Maslow’s pyramid was given existence.

But the industrial revolution is history now. Instead, another social revolution is emerging — a natural next step for the development of the grassroots. It has to do both with information, and the distribution of it. I think the next lifestyle changing development will emerge from a world with a more evenly distributed intelligence, and thus a much greater aggregate. A smarter mob.

To reach it, there are two often overlooked concepts that need to be reconsidered:

1. The importance of “everybody”
No matter how superior the west (and Asia) could be over, let’s say Africa, it is of no worth whatsoever. Not until everybody is on the train, can the population evolve further. Why? Simply because the dependence of a poor nation and a rich nation goes both ways — the rich nation can never truly excel until the poor nation is brought out of poverty.

2. The importance of development
In many places in China, you won’t get a decent job unless you have a PhD. In India there are engineers working in call centers. There is an inflation within education. “Too many are too well educated”. Yes, all this is true, but the positive aspects of it are overlooked. This situation is new, but when it has matured I strongly believe that a much greater set of problems will be possible to address. Simply because more people know more, giving way to more solutions to more problems. Also, if there is one thing the world can not have enough of, it’s knowledge.

Any argument against development will always break. History taught us this.

Therefore, it is of great importance that more people educate themselves. That internet remains free from regulations and corporate interests. That access to internet is given to every person on the planet. That governments increase transparency and thus opening up for crowdsourcing. And especially that the poor nations once and for all can work for increased life quality, instead of sustained life. The answers exist, see for example Copenhagen Consensus.

The fantastic heights of which today’s well-developed civilization has reached, is much due to an aggressive playing of the Prisoner’s dilemma. Great advances at great costs. Short-term thinking in favour for long-sightedness. However, in reaching the next height the game has to be played cooperatively.

All of the above boil down to one question: what will happen when the collective intelligence reaches its tipping point? What happens when information is even more integrated into even more people? What happens when 99% of earth’s population can solve mathematical equations in minutes, and look up facts in seconds?

What happens when we reach the point of a social singularity?

Comments RSS · Print · Tweet

~ End Article and Begin Conversation ~

  • 1

    Nice article.
    Who knows if we will ever get to that point, and if it will be a good thing.
    All I know is a lot of work needs to be done. It’s not only “computational power” that’s important, but the “program” we “execute” in our brains has to improve a lot as well and it has to be the more downloaded torrent ever!
    More people have to reach higher states of consciousness for the world to become a better place.

  • 2

    Thanks for the comment!
    Indeed, it’s not at all sure it will ever be reached. But it’s really interesting to think about, since the potential consequences could be huge! It’s the same as the technological singularity — interesting but still a little science fiction.

  • 3

    Ray Kurzweil says yes.

  • 4

    For the first time I do not fully agree with your argument, (it is about time) :)

    I do not believe that in order for people in Asia to develop there is a need for the people of Africa to “be on the same train”.

    To my knowledge there are still a lot of people in Africa that has not experienced the benefits that an industrial revolution would give, still the remaining world is far ahead. Further I do also believe that in order for some to be strong there is a need for someone else to be weak, simply because the term strong is relative (same goes for poor/rich).

    I do however believe that if everyone develop, including the poor nations, the potential for development is greatly increased. Though the level of development that can be reached through “having the poor on the train” can also be reach without “having the poor on the train” though the process is probably longer.

  • 5

    That wasn’t a too big disagreement ;)

    The core issue is the relationship between strong/weak, rich/poor. I have to say I’m not fully convinced on either side (I never am), and I believe you’re right that one can develop a lot with no regard to “the poor”. But still I think something bigger than just “more development” could be the result if everyone was on the train. But it’s still only a speculation.

    But you’re right that strong/weak is a relative term. But regarding rich/poor, I usually refer to “wealthy”/”non-wealthy” — and that’s actually not a relative term (since there is no fixed amount of wealth that is redistributed, it’s something you can create).

  • 6

    Hmm, I saw my name and started reading the comment and thought “I have absolutely no memory of writing this” then read on and decided that “no, definitely not, that was not me” :P
    Maybe I should comment in a fuller name :P

  • 7

    Haha! Congrats on (not?) recognizing yourself! One of you Fredriks should pick another name…

~ Now It's Your Turn ~

Feel free to use <strong>, <em>, and <a href="">

[]

Search this Site

[]